587,579 active members*
3,397 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
IndustryArena Forum > Mechanical Engineering > Linear and Rotary Motion > Opinions sought on designing skate-bearing slides for 1m x 2m (3.5'x7' roughly)
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    462

    Smile Opinions sought on designing skate-bearing slides for 1m x 2m (3.5'x7' roughly)

    I have drawn and am pondering an idea of a 1000mm x 2000mm (cutting area) router for woodworking. Joes 2006 seems to be out of the question because of the size. And also because I got some HUGE steppers really cheap (nema42 I think they were). And they would go to waste if they weren't mounted on something big. Thus 1000mm x 2000mm cutting area. Think doors.

    Now, since I'm on a really tight budget and the availability of linear components is non-existent in my neck of the woods I'm going for the skate bearings approach.

    Having come up with a design where bearings ride on the standard structural 80x40mm steel tube (gantry section detail attached) I was wondering how accurate can that square tube actually be over a 2000mm length? How bent will it be? What are my options?
    Will actually mounting a 2000m long pipe atop the 80x40 be more precise?

    What I need is accuracy down to 0.1mm as I think woodworking can't benefit from better accuracy but anything bigger than that and you're looking at major headaches when it comes to aligning cut parts. Maybe I could get away with 0.5mm but 0.1mm would be ideal.

    Is it even sane to ask for such accuracy from a DIY gantry router that has a 1000mm x 2000mm cutting area?

    I am going with belt drives (Here a big nod an a smile to Mike Everman, if he doesn't mind me using his idea at home?) as even getting hold of threaded rod is impossible in my neighbourhood, let alone ball screws, and then at that length!

    So ideas please, how straight, accurate, flat etc are these structural steel tubes?

    Thanks for your ideas guys, I'm skinnt right now and getting this machine up and running (after so many failed attempts) would bring me back to life, definitely. :rainfro:
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Gantrydetail.gif  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    462
    maybe I should rename the thread? I'm thinking people don't understand what I'm asking. I know sometimes I don't really put across what I mean to say...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    462
    if I were to lay long strips of glass on the 80x40 tube? would that help? is glass "straight"?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    71
    I have a table thats 3' x 5' right now and i used the skate bearing idea, and steel tube and steel angle, and it seems like it is really straight, i used a large welding table to assemble everything and when i clamp a piece of flat stock onto my gantry and move it around the table, its so close all over that i can't tell if its off or not. I don't know if glass will work, i just decided that 1/8" steel should be strong enough for a DIY machine.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    462
    thanks trucks! do you have a picture of your setup that you could post?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    71

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    35
    I have a few thoughts on this. Hopefully what you're looking for is honest feedback.

    Overall accuracy is different than repeatability, and both of these have as much to do with your transmission components (belts, screws, rack & pinion) as your frame.

    It should be noted, that there are people that have spent big bucks on profile or linear rails with linear bearings and have precision machined components on a precision aligned frame and aren't getting anywhere near the 0.1mm accuracy you're looking for, especially at the size you're looking at.

    As a rule of thumb, a generally descent ball screw might have an accuracy of 0.003" per foot. You're looking for this for your whole system. Belts stretch, rack and pinions have backlash...

    My point is that I think you have expectations pretty high. The beauty of wood is that there's sandpaper for the fine tuning of mating parts. You'll probably need to compromise your accuracy requirements or your budget. That choice is up to you.

    Good luck!

    Matt
    Matt Adams - Motion Control Application Engineer
    IMAC Motion Control - Elgin, IL

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    462
    ah ok so that's a good start. my expectations are too high. so what am I looking at then? 1mm? 0.5mm? and how difficult is it to get those numbers from plain stock structural steel tubing? and is 80x40 a little "oversize"? can I go lower, maybe 40x40?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    462
    oh and thanks for honest feedback, much appreciated, indeed!

Similar Threads

  1. Which Skate Bearing Design Is Better?
    By Dman65 in forum Linear and Rotary Motion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-05-2009, 01:19 PM
  2. Skate Bearing Blocks?
    By thebluedirt in forum Linear and Rotary Motion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-08-2009, 02:59 PM
  3. Lifespan of a Skate Bearing.
    By Miata2k in forum DIY CNC Router Table Machines
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-22-2006, 06:53 PM
  4. skate bearing design
    By paul langwade in forum DIY CNC Router Table Machines
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-30-2006, 01:56 AM
  5. Skate Bearing Design
    By coolman in forum DIY CNC Router Table Machines
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-20-2005, 07:25 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •