587,004 active members*
2,698 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
IndustryArena Forum > MetalWorking > MetalWork Discussion > machining 17-4 stainless
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    121

    machining 17-4 stainless

    Need some advise on machining 17-4 PH SS condition A ( 35C Hardness), I have a job to machine out of this material .This is a mill job that will be done on a HAAS VF-1. What is a good SFP to run a carbide end mill (.500) at ?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1511
    I would start in the range of 200-230SF and .001-.003chip

    It's not the fastest but we were mainly concerned with tool life.

    Stevo

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5

    hope this helps

    check this out.

    http://www.whitney-tool.com/assets/PDFs/35.pdf

    hope this helps
    Steve K.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    246
    35 HRc sound real hard for 17-4 condition A. That level hardness is usually acheived at an H1000 or H1050 condition. i would double check the material specs and make sure you know exactly what you're cutting. We run a lot of 15-5PH H975 which is 36-38 HRc. We'll regularly run coated carbide ball end mills at around 425 - 500 sfm for 5-axis contouring.
    I don't know much about anything but I know a little about everything....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    121
    Quote Originally Posted by cdlenterprises View Post
    35 HRc sound real hard for 17-4 condition A. That level hardness is usually acheived at an H1000 or H1050 condition. i would double check the material specs and make sure you know exactly what you're cutting. We run a lot of 15-5PH H975 which is 36-38 HRc. We'll regularly run coated carbide ball end mills at around 425 - 500 sfm for 5-axis contouring.

    I am not exactly sure what the condition is but I do know that the engineer that I am doing the work for says it will be from 35 to 37 RW c . I will be using un coated carbide to do the milling . Most of the cuts will be facing cuts and side milling cuts . How much would you reduce the sfm for uncoated carbide? Also I will be using cobalt m42 drills for the holes do you have any suggestions for them ?

    Thanks for your help !!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    121
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Dontech View Post
    check this out.

    http://www.whitney-tool.com/assets/PDFs/35.pdf

    hope this helps
    Steve K.
    Thanks Steve this helps ALOT !!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    376
    Quote Originally Posted by cdlenterprises View Post
    35 HRc sound real hard for 17-4 condition A. That level hardness is usually acheived at an H1000 or H1050 condition.
    I don't know why they call it annealed, its not, its solution treated, ready to be precipitation hardened, and yes it is that hard in the annealed/solution treated condition.

    My suggestion, get it heat treated first, 17-4 in an H1150 increases its machinability by about 50%. In the annealed condition it is gummy and nasty and acts sort of like 304, but more manageable. Heat treated it actually acts more like a heat treated 4xxx. The gumminess goes away, it doesn't stick, machines very well dry, doesn't work harden like a 3xx stainless.

    Even if you need it heat treated to an H900, which is mid to high 40s on the C scale, it will be easier to machine than when its annealed/solution treated.

    Don't be scared of it, its a wonderful material, machines very well. Heat treated, treat it like an alloy steel. It will give you beautiful finishes.

    Uncoated carbide, annealed, 200sfm wet, drill 30-40sfm.

    Heat treated, (don't know what HT you might have) 200-250 sfm dry. drill 40-60sfm.

    Coated carbide on HT material, 275-375 sfm. Inserted facemill I'd push into the 450-500 range.

    Make sure you know exactly what you are working with, makes a lot of difference, even if you have to smack the engineer upside the head.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    121
    Quote Originally Posted by little bubba View Post
    I don't know why they call it annealed, its not, its solution treated, ready to be precipitation hardened, and yes it is that hard in the annealed/solution treated condition.

    My suggestion, get it heat treated first, 17-4 in an H1150 increases its machinability by about 50%. In the annealed condition it is gummy and nasty and acts sort of like 304, but more manageable. Heat treated it actually acts more like a heat treated 4xxx. The gumminess goes away, it doesn't stick, machines very well dry, doesn't work harden like a 3xx stainless.

    Even if you need it heat treated to an H900, which is mid to high 40s on the C scale, it will be easier to machine than when its annealed/solution treated.

    Don't be scared of it, its a wonderful material, machines very well. Heat treated, treat it like an alloy steel. It will give you beautiful finishes.

    Uncoated carbide, annealed, 200sfm wet, drill 30-40sfm.

    Heat treated, (don't know what HT you might have) 200-250 sfm dry. drill 40-60sfm.

    Coated carbide on HT material, 275-375 sfm. Inserted facemill I'd push into the 450-500 range.

    Make sure you know exactly what you are working with, makes a lot of difference, even if you have to smack the engineer upside the head.

    Thanks for the info, I machined the parts with the speed you recommend and all went well !

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    118

Similar Threads

  1. Help Machining Stainless
    By stuby in forum MetalWork Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-05-2008, 11:30 AM
  2. Machining Full Hard Stainless
    By Triumph in forum MetalWork Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-12-2008, 04:13 AM
  3. Machining 304 stainless tube.
    By l u k e in forum Uncategorised MetalWorking Machines
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-13-2008, 09:26 AM
  4. Machining Parameters for 15-5 Stainless
    By wganders in forum Uncategorised CAM Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-13-2007, 07:12 PM
  5. machining 304 stainless steel
    By pauls in forum MetalWork Discussion
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 08-01-2005, 04:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •