586,852 active members*
2,276 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
Page 1 of 47 12311
Results 1 to 20 of 1027

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    81

    Backlash free rotary table

    I want to build a rotary table that can handle continuous milling!
    Do you think my drawing would work?
    The upper gear belt pulley can rotate freely on the axle, and is connected to the axle via the spring, and is preloaded.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails anti-backash.jpg  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2712
    As an alternative, "google" Howimat. This concept is ball driven like a ballscrew in the round.

    Dick Z
    DZASTR

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    81
    I will check it out! I have also been thinking of using 2 servos and do the preload eletronically with a µC

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    27

    Re: Backlash free rotary table

    this Patent US5286236 - Ball-type speed reducer - Google Patents
    can get to zero backlash if tight enough

    I saw no comments about the hypocycloid reducer link I posted. It seems clearly DIY level since somebody made one...
    would be worth looking into.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by RICHARD ZASTROW View Post
    As an alternative, "google" Howimat. This concept is ball driven like a ballscrew in the round.

    Dick Z
    I poked around the DetlevHofmann site, and while they mention the Howimat drives, there is almost no info. They do mention a patent but I couldn't find it. I was wondering if anyone has seen the patent, or knows where it is?

    Regards,
    Raymond

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    81
    Did just draw a 105:1 gearbox!
    The housing is 100mm diameter and 45 mm long.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails gear bearing.jpg   gear bearing2.jpg   housing.jpg  

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    573
    Looks like it would work to me, although mixing gears, lubricant and timing belts might be a problem.

    How about placing the two worm gears at an angle to each other, driving one directly and the other via a bevel gear? (if you see what I mean)

    Or...

    What about a buying or copying Commercial anti backlash worm drive ?
    Bill

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    81
    Hmm, thats an interesting idea! I'll make a drawing!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    81

    Faliure

    I made a drawing and realized that the worms would need to rotate in the same direction in this configuration :P

    The dual servo version seems more and more appealing!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails ab.jpg  

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2502
    There are a lot of commercially available low backlash drives on eBay. Search for "harmonic drive" or "bayside drive". One of those sure will least trouble and expense.

    Another possibility is to preload the heck out of your rotab drive with another gear and some bellvues. Not sure how much torque you plan to put on it though.

    People also run 2 of the main circular gears spring loaded to spread the teeth just enough to get rid of the backlash. In this case, you'd make the spread adjustable with a threaded screw.

    These last two solutions seem prone to binding and wear.

    I would be tempted to also consider a big timing belt drive. properly set up, you'll get minimal backlash. People are even using these for linear motion with good success.

    For really high torque situations, you might still find a brake is useful. Slew the 4th axis to the desired position, send an M-code to lock the brake, cut, and unlock. Small disk brakes from everything from mini-bikes to lawn tractors are readily available and work with an air over hydraulic and solenoid valve.

    Cheers,

    BW

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by Zoidberg View Post
    I made a drawing and realized that the worms would need to rotate in the same direction in this configuration :P

    The dual servo version seems more and more appealing!
    You could use a right and left threaded worn screw but in your desing, backalsh is transfered to the bevel gears!!

    Keep going on design, i am also interested in a rotary axe.

    thanks
    petecul

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    573
    Just swap the main-shaft bevel gear to the front of the perpendicular one.
    Bill

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    81
    Aaah yes...

    :withstupi

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    81
    I want it to be able to use it for continuous milling, like gear hobbing and milling springs, not just indexing!

    I think it's best to have the worms axially stiff because they can't be backdriven. So if you just can keep both worms in contact with the gear teeth with a little rotational preload it should be backlash free and much stiffer than the version with axial preload of the worms or split wormgear!

    Harmonic drive seems nice! But i like to design and build stuff more than paying for complete solutions

    I was thinking of a gear belt drive at first.. but it's a little impractical when you want 1:100 ratio or so..

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1084
    Quote Originally Posted by Zoidberg View Post

    Harmonic drive seems nice! But i like to design and build stuff more than paying for complete solutions

    I was thinking of a gear belt drive at first.. but it's a little impractical when you want 1:100 ratio or so..

    Machine your own harmonic drive
    Would probably be the best solution for your application, you can get 100:1 no problem, and I'm pretty sure most of the new 4th axis equiptment are using harmonic drives? It's how I ran accross them.
    Decent load handling, probably indefinate gearing available, no backlash due to design, compact and readily available.

    But if your determined to make it all yourself, I like the duel servo idea. But are you going to make the servo's?:stickpoke
    Just joking, I get it,
    MC

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    210
    Just a couple of basic engineering things to think about.

    Solid worm gears need some clearance to operate or they lock. Worm gears are not very efficient which is why they don't backdrive easily.

    Let's say you adjust your drive worms for .0001 clearance. Have you thought about runout on the main gear? This is why Hass hobs their gears after they are mounted. Ever priced a class 9 worm gear set? I pay over $4500 for mine and they are only 6 inch in dia.

    Spring loaded worm gears use very light springs to allow the halves to move when operating. Because of this it's very easy to overcome the springs and they have very limited top speeds or they wear like crazy from the sliding friction between the worm and wheel.

    The wheel gear is fairly large and grows and shrinks with temp changes. Set one up in a 68 degree room with almost no clearance and it will be locked solid when the wheel temp goes up to 80 degrees. Worm gears generate a fair amount of heat when running because the sliding friction is so high.

    Harmonic drives can be purchased in zero mechanical backlash configurations but the main drive flexspline is made of spring steel and will deflect under pressure (although not as much flex as a split worm gear). Grab the end of a robot arm and move it back and forth. Older robots are almost all harmonic drives.

    Dual worms driven by servos are a nice idea but how do you get around the problem that the gear teeth are not going to be exactly spaced. You have to consider manufacturing tolerances into any design work. No gearset is perfect.

    There are also high resolution direct drive rotary motors. Basically linear motors wrapped in a circle. These are used in the rotary axis of very high end machine tools and high priced robots. Very expensive and they still have at least +/- 5 counts of "backlash".

    IMO a harmonic drive from e-bay makes a good option (they are very expensive purchased new). Be aware that they are not all "zero backlash" units and mounting accuracy of the components is critical. They also take up more room than a worm drive.
    DDR motors are great but they require very high resolution feedback devices and sophisticated controllers.
    Worm gears work but you just have to live with some backlash in a fixed design or give up top speed and realize life will be shorten in a spring loaded design.

    The life of any machine designer is full of tradeoffs.
    Bob
    You can always spot the pioneers -- They're the ones with the arrows in their backs.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    41

    Building a 90:1, dual stage cycloidal reducer

    Inspired by this thread and the .pdf found by aystarik, I built a dual stage 90:1 cycloidal reducer. The main issue in creating the reducer is the generation of the cam profile as it is a fairly complex function. To solve this problem I wrote a Python script to automatically generate a .dxf file with the specified parameters.

    Autocad drawing of the reducer:


    A shot of the inside of the reducer showing the 9 lobe cam on top, the 10 lobe cam on bottom meshing with the 11 outer pins in the housing:


    The reducer was machined from 2" diameter Delrin rod I had lying around.

    Video of the reducer in operation. The drill is running at around 2000rpm and I can only hear the noise from the drill.
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ye8NtIZkixI"]YouTube - Hypocycloid reducer[/ame]

    If you would like the script I used to generate the cams and some more pictures, see my page on the subject

    I plan to make an new version with two bearings on the input shaft as the single bearing allows some play. I also need to measure the backlash.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    6028
    Or just buy the mori or hardinge direct drive unit. Can run at a constant speed no problem, no gears, no backlash.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    524
    Has anyone considered making one of these?

    http://urobotics.urology.jhu.edu/projects/BW/

    They can be made with zero backlash and low friction.

    Ken
    Kenneth Lerman
    55 Main Street
    Newtown, CT 06470

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1084
    Harmonic Drive is the way to go, if your willing to spend a little money.

    http://www.powertransmission.com/iss...6/harmonic.htm

Page 1 of 47 12311

Similar Threads

  1. Backlash free R&P
    By Al_The_Man in forum Linear and Rotary Motion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-07-2014, 06:28 PM
  2. Adding a rotary encoder to a large Rotary Table
    By small.planes in forum Mechanical Calculations/Engineering Design
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-27-2012, 07:27 PM
  3. Phase II 4" rotary table backlash.
    By TXFred in forum Benchtop Machines
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-12-2011, 01:27 AM
  4. Rotary Table Backlash
    By fc911c in forum Uncategorised MetalWorking Machines
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-18-2010, 10:11 AM
  5. Typical Backlash on a new Yuasa 8" Rotary Table
    By Roy Norris in forum MetalWork Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-10-2005, 10:33 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •