586,358 active members*
3,572 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    14

    Question cutter comp issues

    Does anyone know of any problems with using cutter comp (G41/G42)while in incremental mode? I am milling "O" ring groves to a specific width and I use a subprogram in incremental mode to produce the groove, This is necessary because ecch center of the bore has to be picked up individually. If you do not activate cutter comp, it will work fine. If you do, the machine will position to some absolute position then work the groove.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    24222
    I have never used G41/42 in incremental move, but usually the requirement is that the G41/41 be engaged at least one move prior to the point of effect and the move be greater than the comp amount itself.
    Al.
    CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Custom Machine Design

    “Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
    Albert E.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    4826
    I've never used cutter comp with my camsoft retro, so I have no idea how it behaves. But if I were attempting to troubleshoot the problem, I would try a couple of things:
    -try using a G80 with the G40 and/or G90. I know, it sounds crazy, but G80 to camsoft has some strange powers to break modal behaviours.

    -Try using G92 between calls to the sub, and stay in absolute mode. To do this in a controlled manner, I typically use a G53 command to move the machine in the machine coordinate system, then re-name that point with whatever values I want it to have using the G92.

    -Check to see if camsoft has implemented a G52 coordinate system shift capability similar to Haas. This method would probably be the preferred method on a standard cnc controller, but if Camsoft has not implemented the logic to do it, then it won't work. G52 also allows you to program a subroutine in absolute mode and it will behave like an incremental chunk of code because you can move its origin around with G52. My G53/G92 combo method described above is similar to an implementation of G52.

    One important distinction with camsoft, is that G92 does not irrevocably alter the machine coordinate system as may happen with standard cnc controllers. So you can always command a move in G53 to get back to a known position safely, then use G92 to set a new origin.

    My experience relates to using camsoft with a 2 axis lathe system, so my advice may be a bit off.
    First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in.

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    14

    Wink

    Hi Guys;
    What actually happens is the cutter will comp on the first move correctly.
    It will do the outer ring correctly (G41 comp left G03 circle). When you cancel comp. and make the move back to the original start point, that is where it moves the comp figure (NOT the distance minus (-)comp). This only happens in incremental mode. I did reprogram it using the much preferred work offsets, but the other boring mills will work without any problems even the AB 8400. Imagine that!

Similar Threads

  1. Cutter comp on an id hole< cutter diam.??
    By PaintItBlue in forum Haas Mills
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-06-2008, 12:30 AM
  2. Cutter Comp?
    By donl517 in forum Fadal
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-03-2007, 02:36 PM
  3. Cutter Comp.
    By Big"E" in forum MetalWork Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-28-2007, 05:05 PM
  4. G17 to G18 Comp issues
    By ParkerMillguy in forum G-Code Programing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-08-2007, 12:46 AM
  5. 18-it cutter comp
    By newcinhypro in forum Fanuc
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-26-2006, 03:00 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •