This is an engineering decision that is yours to make. Is the extra 2" of travel side to side more important, or do you want the little bit of extra stiffness that a wider footprint might (or might not) provide?
I have a 12' long homebuilt machine using early CNCRP R&P drives that has two 6' gear racks butted end to end with the teeth facing downward. I rarely need to do anything to the racks during cutting jobs. Fine dust collects on the top side of the racks when not in use for long periods, but not in the gear teeth. Anything you can devise that covers the racks and rails to deflect flying chips and dust will mean less diligence in keeping them clean during long cut jobs.