Hi John
Thanks for not laughing
It appears when Nasa did their testing, it was a compressive strength test.
The researchers took a "column" of the original and cooked samples and loaded then from the top in compression, the uncooked sample deformed to 1/2 the size of the cooked sample before it fractured.
So far I have found that the formations are basaltic in nature, and the reported increases in modulus ranged from minimum of 2x to 7x. Highly dependent on the sample as one would expect.
Assuming cooking works, then once the aggregate is bound in the epoxy, would we expect moisture to penetrate the epoxy?
Thanks
Al