[daniellyall]

It wouldn't have the same results on the finished product , short line segmented codes are extremely noticeable on metal . It might be fine on wood but certainly not on metal .
Besides the amount of code needed to create a clean arc with the use of line segments would be quite large vs a single line or two of code , I can't see how it would be near as efficient .

the code for a line segments to do arc`s is massive and is very ugly I tried it ounces never again you can still see it in wood and you can hear it (it was not done with a UCCNC)

[dubble]

This does not makes sense, except if you fragmented the arc with low resolution.

[daniellyall]

This does not makes sense, except if you fragmented the arc with low resolution.

was years ago with what was meant to be a top of the line cad program what put out lots of not so tiny lines, what i use now put out a small code that use`s arc`s yes it`s tiny lines but it has bugger all code so its faster, cleaner and very time saving.

dubble I am not saying anything about your controller never used it just saying about what I have used and use now so nothing on you.

[dubble]

daniellyall,

That's ok, I did not think you told anything about our controller. I was just telling my opinion on your comment based on my knowledge in this theme.

And yes, you are right about that the code is then much longer and more calculations are needed, but today's computers can handle it, they are fast enough to deal with the task.
The original post I was replying to was about that the UCCNC currently does not understand the G18/G19 codes which is true and I thought to share with your the workaround...