586,470 active members*
3,193 visitors online*
Register for free
Login

Search:

Type: Posts; User: matt3o

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    just for the sake of completeness and for future reference... I made some more tests and it seems that I really need 0.01 tolerance or better to get satisfactory results. Surely configuring madcam...
  2. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    thanks for your continued feedback.

    my original post originated from the fact that with basically no config I was able to obtain more precise pieces with meshcam than I could with madcam. Which...
  3. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    I finally got it working (almost :) ). Honestly I don't know what was the problem. I reset my mach3 and recalibrated the motors and I updated the options as suggested by Dan. I also lowered the...
  4. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    Thank you Mauri, I can't post the model publicly but I will be sending it privately after today's last test.
  5. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    maybe I've got an idea about what is happening... Most of my mills have a bigger shaft than the actual end mill size. meshcam has automatic collision detection, madcam does not. Meaning that in some...
  6. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    I made a very stupid error in the stock setup today and thrown away one day of work. Tomorrow I'll try again and see if the new configuration solved my issue.



    very interesting. hopefully that...
  7. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    I believe I started from 0.02 in the "edge to surface" and tried 0.05 later. Anyway I'll give it a shot, just to be sure. Absolute tolerance from 0.01 to to 0.002 is a big jump... let's see what...
  8. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    This is my config

    http://i.imgur.com/QhakOkD.png

    http://i.imgur.com/KIHLUsg.png
  9. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    thanks for taking the time to check this.

    I only have 3.175 end mills, "FLAT_END_3" is just a label I use for brevity. I have absolutely no idea why madcam code ends up with a -0.3mm product.
    ...
  10. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    I did one last test. I reset my whole Mach3 config and started over from scratch (just to be sure it's not a configuration error). I manually edited some gcode and cut a small box out of wood....
  11. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    oh okay, sorry.

    It's a very small file, I'm pasting it here


    //MadCAM_POST_2003-12-10
    *VERSION*
    1.0_031210
    *FILE_NAME*
    Mach3_Gcode
  12. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    I probably did something wrong... but isn't it attached to the previous post?
  13. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    I attached the two post processings. cube-mesh is from meshcam. cube.txt is from madcam with mach3 post-processor.

    Meshcam creates a lot of "noise", but if you look at the end of the file you can...
  14. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    I did a quick test with a 20x20x20mm cube, roughing with stock to leave = 0 and same tolerance. Same end mill configuration on madcam and another CAM.

    Can it be a problem with the header? Madcam...
  15. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    thank you for helping me on this.

    yes, the values are as suggested in the help file. everything's set in mm.

    I use a digital caliper to measure the finished part.

    This is driving me crazy, I...
  16. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    I tried again with lower definition and tolerance, unfortunately I got the same result.

    Flat 3

    http://i.imgur.com/BD6xs5M.png

    http://i.imgur.com/vd1FTlT.png

    Ball 2
  17. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Re: Slightly wrong size end result

    Thanks for your reply Dan. I'm sure I'm doing something wrong. I can't publicly publish the model, but it's easily replicable with any relatively small model.

    http://i.imgur.com/51k2hBA.png

    - A...
  18. Replies
    36
    Views
    5,243

    Slightly wrong size end result

    I'm sure I'm doing something incredibly stupid, I'm new to this world, I recently got my first hobbyist-CNC (I'm doing small commission works for modelers mainly) and I'm evaluating madcam and...
  19. Replies
    8,430
    Views
    336,057

    Sticky: Re: Welcome thread-tell us about you.

    got my first Chinese CNC and I must say that I underestimated the time/dedication needed to have these machines working they way you wanted. I'm mainly a hobbyst but do very small commission works....
Results 1 to 19 of 19